Meer dan 650 internationale wetenschappers zijn het NIET eens met opwarmingclaims

Laatste wijziging: donderdag 11 december om 21:12, 3006 keer bekeken
Groningen, donderdag 11 december 2008



Op dit ogenblik is in Poznan, Polen de grote UN opwarmingsconferentie aan de gang. Meer dan 650 wetenschappers stellen daar dat de menselijke opwarmtheorie van de UN en Gore Al onjuist is. Al weer 250 meer dan het vorig jaar, en het aantal sceptici is sterk groeiende.

Dit moet een behoorlijke schok zijn voor klimaathypers. Het ziet er naar uit dat die steeds meer gedwongen worden om de feiten te erkennen. 
Vandaag willen de EU opperhoofden in Brussel weer met elkaar afspreken om het volk miljarden belasting te laten betalen voor een opwarmgevaar dat nog maar de vraag is of het ooit komt. En dat in een situatie waarin de wereld al in een financiële crisis zit.
Wijze mensen zouden eerst afwachten wat de feiten zijn en dan naar bewind van zaken de noodzakelijke maatregelen nemen. Stap voor stap en niet luisteren naar politici die een zielig ijsbeertje laten zwemmen en dan zeggen dat de zeespiegel 6 meter gaat stijgen.

Hier zijn enkele verse artikelen die je, als je nog niet zover bent, kunnen overtuigen. Met heel aardige citaten van wetenschappers, waaronder

–”I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” - Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.   

–”Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” -  Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology  and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”  

–”Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” - UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.  

–”The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” - Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.  

–”The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC “are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” - Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico  

–”It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” - U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA. 

–”Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” - . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

–”After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri’s asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it’s hard to remain quiet.” - Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society’s Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.  

–”For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?” - Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.  

–”Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp…Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.” - Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.  

–”Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.” - Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.

–”Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

–”CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another….Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so…Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.” - Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.

–”The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.” - Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata. 

U vindt er ook verwijzingen naar een aantal nieuwe publicaties.

Wij zijn ook benieuwd naar een nieuw rapport van de US Senaat dat binnen 24 uur zou uitkomen.
Iets minder benieuwd zijn we naar het verhaal waarmee Jan Peter Balkenende uit Brussel naar huis komt. Minder benieuwd omdat we verwachten dat hij gewoon met de hypers mee zal zingen.

Bron: vrijspreker